The Institute for Advanced HomophobiaDeviance, Poz, and Faggotry, OH MY!
#201
Posted 11 May 2013 - 01:45 PM
#202
Posted 11 May 2013 - 08:21 PM
:vomit:
#203
Posted 11 May 2013 - 08:42 PM
also f**k
Field Report to Follow,
Cockosaurus
#204
Posted 18 May 2013 - 09:51 PM
A touching story of mass gay orgies in the 70's, including a huge comments section filled mostly with rationalizations but also absurdities:
Quote
There's also no coherency to any of it. What makes a gay hero? Being gay, pretty much. I remember a few years back some gays talking about a random American Revolutionary figure and suggesting he was gay because, basically, he wasn't married. Thus they tried to make him a "gay hero." Alan Turing's gayness only mattered because he killed himself over losing his career (and growing literal manboobs due to botched "treatment"), but otherwise only has value in showing someone that you can be intelligent and gay, not exactly a great revelation.
#206
Posted 19 May 2013 - 08:12 AM
Halim Jello, on 18 May 2013 - 09:51 PM, said:
Not to derail, but the blog entry ends with this:
Quote
Yes, let's not have any thought police--and please check your [insert PC accusation] at the door!
Pseudo-conservatism at its most genteel and inoffensive and stupid.
This admonition is tacked on to the end of a series of descriptions by gay men of their own revolting behavior and a litany of diseases spread by them. It is predictably followed in the comments by that old saw, "straight men would act this way too if women let them!" Of course this claim is belied by evidence that most men do not engage in extreme sexual behavior that does not require general female approval--for example, heavy porn consumption, visiting strip clubs, attending peep shows, hiring prostitutes, etc. These activities are practiced by a small minority of adult men and are not regarded as normal. Even PUA behavior, which is an extremely mild version of the hooking up that gay men engage in, is not only rare but generally looked down on by men who are aware of it.
But there is seemingly no way to stomp this argument out among the nerds who spread it. They can look at the IQ scores of blacks and draw a wide range of conclusions on what this confirms about foresightedness, criminal behavior, illegitimacy, but a massive epidemic with gay men at the center of it, a subculture riddled with infantile and grotesque sexuality, and generally hedonistic and amoral behavior (including indifference to spreading disease among their sexual partners) is just too inconclusive for them. I know this gay guy who seems alright! Of course one may know bipolars, alcoholics, drug addicts, neurotics, and so on who are basically decent people--but they are mentally ill, and their illness affects the people around them, and in great enough numbers it damages society. To not seek to contain and treat it to the best of our ability is gross negligence.
Of course the last comment is a piece of sterling autism that requires no reply:
Quote
#207
Posted 19 May 2013 - 08:28 AM
#208
Posted 19 May 2013 - 10:27 AM
Quote
Lara said in a statement that while he is encouraged that the group is "working to put an end to their discriminatory practices of excluding LGBT youth," the proposed change announced today, which does not include gay scout leaders or adults, "falls short from implementing a truly inclusive policy."
"While the proposed resolution is a step in the right direction, continuing the ban of LGBT adults is premised on absurd assumptions and stereotypes that perpetuate homophobia and ignorance," Lara said in the statement. "The Youth Equality Act will continue to move forward as we seek to protect California's LGBT youth in perpetuity from being excluded from either existing or future youth groups."
remember: homos are a weak and defenseless minority fighting against the powerful institutional juggernaut of american christofascism
#209
Posted 19 May 2013 - 05:22 PM
Quote
I just don’t f**king
#210
Posted 19 May 2013 - 06:26 PM
#211
Posted 19 May 2013 - 07:04 PM
Crabtree, on 19 May 2013 - 05:22 PM, said:
Not true. The homosexual lifestyle is profligate and expensive since it's flamboyant, they don't have any kids except as adopted and easily discarded accessories so it's not like they'll ever save money to put them through college. AIDS research and treatments funnel money to the sickcare system through expensive drugs and treatments, which all go through the taxpayer dime, and being short term thinkers they will go deeply into debt to appease their superficial personalities.
Basically it's like having extra women juicing the economy, except even moreso because they can serve as role models to the male youth as long as they're not so over-the-top faggy that they're offputting to their rapidly dwindling senses of masculinity.
Just like anything else, if you want to see why something happens, follow the trail of greenbacks.
They also accused his wife of turning into a snail and terrorising the community.
#212
Posted 19 May 2013 - 08:02 PM
Crabtree, on 19 May 2013 - 05:22 PM, said:
Quote
I just don’t f**king
Dont blame business only, blame academia too. Colleges and universities are pumping out the left leaning cretins off a production line. Many of those students take their pozzed values and education into the workforce, which in turn starts to have a huge impact on company culture as they gradually work their way up the food chain. Same can be said for many who end up in civil service. Its not about companies looking to profit only, its about individuals within those companies or government departments making decisions that impacts the organisation as a whole.
#213
Posted 19 May 2013 - 08:07 PM
George Obsolete Peppard (GOP), on 19 May 2013 - 07:04 PM, said:
Just like anything else, if you want to see why something happens, follow the trail of greenbacks.
Interesting. Another workshop from that conference I linked to seems to confirm what you're saying:
Quote
Are homosexuals really such a guaranteed boon to the global economy? In the short term, companies only risk pissing people off by sponsoring gay activism in regions hostile to it.
#214
Posted 19 May 2013 - 08:29 PM
* http://www.guardian....us-aid-criteria
* http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15511081
It's the unlikely transformation of homosexuality into a geopolitical tool. One day a 90-year old African man will tell his adopted grandchildren the story of how the year 2015 heralded victorious Burundian gay liberation after American President Whiteman threatened to nuke the whole country if it didn't immediately set up cisgender creation stations or something.
#215
Posted 19 May 2013 - 10:21 PM
#216
Posted 19 May 2013 - 10:26 PM
Aussie Mackey, on 19 May 2013 - 08:02 PM, said:
Good point, but that raises a related question: why did the Academic Left start worshipping gays? I know there's a long tradition of academics promoting aberrant sex (Freud & Kinsey et al), but it's only recently, ca. 1990 or so, that university admins decided "queer theory" was a crucial field of study and mentally ill, AIDS-ridden sex addicts should be entrusted with their own departments. Even if you're trying to undermine social mores, it doesn't seem smart to put promiscuous f****ts
I think gays are what destroyed the Left and turned it from a coherent ideology espoused by actual (if misguided and/or sociopathic) intellectuals, to a discordant mob of sexually confused retards advocating equal rights for cartoon pony lovers and extraterrestrial cats in human bodies. I doubt that anyone in the Frankfurt School ever in their wildest dreams thought cultural Marxism would include this:
#217
Posted 19 May 2013 - 10:56 PM
Crabtree, on 19 May 2013 - 10:26 PM, said:
Aussie Mackey, on 19 May 2013 - 08:02 PM, said:
Good point, but that raises a related question: why did the Academic Left start worshipping gays? I know there's a long tradition of academics promoting aberrant sex (Freud & Kinsey et al), but it's only recently, ca. 1990 or so, that university admins decided "queer theory" was a crucial field of study and mentally ill, AIDS-ridden sex addicts should be entrusted with their own departments. Even if you're trying to undermine social mores, it doesn't seem smart to put promiscuous f****ts
I think gays are what destroyed the Left and turned it from a coherent ideology espoused by actual (if misguided and/or sociopathic) intellectuals, to a discordant mob of sexually confused retards advocating equal rights for cartoon pony lovers and extraterrestrial cats in human bodies. I doubt that anyone in the Frankfurt School ever in their wildest dreams thought cultural Marxism would include this:

Its the nature of progressives to show support for anything that will give them the social validation they are looking for. By being a more radical progressive than their counterparts, they can prove that they are the better and more enlightened progressive. Eventually the shaming reaches the point where the average liberal just relents and goes with the flow in an effort to avoid any social ostracisation, and before you know it homosexuals are elevated from degenerate, mentally ill sickos to victims worthy of sainthood. What was fringe is now mainstream.
You can see this in all their argumentation, where their entire position is often reliant on their ability to label or shame the opposition into compliance. Academics more than most are prone to this, purely because peer acceptance and validation is so crucial to their success as academics.
Its a non stop pissing contest between them and its why all poz is a slippery slope. There is no end point, its a race towards utter degeneracy. It does not stop. It defies reason because its an emotional position they take, often bereft of any real moral foundation. And its the idealism with the complete lack of moral foundation which they pass onto their students, who take it as gospel as they move into the world as an "educated intellectuals" shaping the organisations and institutions they work for.
#218
Posted 19 May 2013 - 11:00 PM
PLEASUREMAN, on 19 May 2013 - 06:26 PM, said:
Great observation - homosexuality and clustered sexual deviations I think are more prevalent among elites. This could be due to the fact that elites were/are often segregated from women (females were secluded in ancient Greek society; elite sons of British aristocrats were sent off to boarding schools for years, with the only women they saw being relatives), but there is also likely a genetic component - given the small size and interbred character of the British ruling class or the Spartiate elite in Lakonia, a genetic predisposition could arise and quickly become hegemonic.
C.S.Lewis in Surprised by Joy noted that English boarding schools were hotbeds for homosexual activity and pederasty - where the most effeminate boy in the dorm would play the role of the Tart. Christopher Hitchens commented on a similar phenomenon (in disgusting detail) in his autobiography (he had several dalliances with future Tory minsters). Like most other Greek societies, the Spartan elite, the full citizen Spartiates, also engaged in homosexuality and pederasty - to such an extent that a newly-wed bride would have her head shaved to match those of male lovers; the elite Theban infantry - the Sacred Band were paired lovers; aristocratic homosexual couples like Harmodius and Aristogeiton, and Alexander and Hephaestion were not uncommon and were notoriously unstable - Harmodius and Aristogeiton assassinated Athenian tyrant Hipparchus over sexual jealousy, and Alexander was almost certainly bipolar and/or a malignant narcissist (he built a city for a horse, killed his own generals, forced Macedonian elites to adopt Persian customs and compelled them to marry locals, and marched his discontented army across Gedrosian desert just to spite them.) A young boy (paidika) would take the role of catamite or Ganymede to an older man, who served both as a lover and as a mentor. This sexual relationship with the boy would end with the appearance of the adult beard and full sexual maturity, which was considered revolting.
Since intelligence is correlated with novelty seeking behaviour, the elite segment of society, who are more intelligent on average, are more likely to engage in decadent actions that are were looked down on by the lower orders. For instance, you can't imagine Spartan helots or working class Victorian-era Brits being sympathetic towards or participating in the Bacchanalian orgies or pedastric relationships that aristocratic scions frequently engaged in.
Edited by KhalidSheikhHorowitz, 19 May 2013 - 11:03 PM.

ANZAC CRU 2014
#219
Posted 20 May 2013 - 04:09 AM
KhalidSheikhHorowitz, on 19 May 2013 - 11:00 PM, said:
Quote
One thing I found bizarre, though (if true), was a RevLeft post:
Quote
Hardly surprising, being as Schweitzer, Lassalle's successor as leader of the Lassalleans, was widely known to be homosexual, indeed having been arrested for sexual relations with a 14 year old boy in a Berlin public park. So any other position would have undermined the unity of the party.
And, be it noted, when the issue of legalizing homosexuality came up in the Reichstag during the Weimar Republic, which of course it did, the Weimar Republic being the Castro Street of the era, the Communists were the most militant defenders of homosexual rights, criticizing the Social Dems for selling out on the issue. The KPD was very well known for its liberated attitudes on all sexual matters.
#220
Posted 20 May 2013 - 05:02 AM












