Who Is Koanic?Fact #1: Not a good poster
#21
Posted 06 August 2012 - 10:26 PM
#22
Posted 06 August 2012 - 10:52 PM
Is it over or under 3?
#23
Posted 06 August 2012 - 11:09 PM
I haven't. Don't have an opinion on it either.
Now, who has the most emphatic opinion on goons and their movies?
#24
Posted 07 August 2012 - 12:06 AM
How many Ewoks have you molested?
#25
Posted 07 August 2012 - 01:40 AM
Stand by it we need to ban video game and comic movie threads.

This is me, reading each post of yours
#26
Posted 07 August 2012 - 02:24 AM
#27
Posted 07 August 2012 - 03:19 AM
Over use of the word sperg, being offended by a summer blockbuster, PUA kookery and ponyfaggotry. Would be a great troll for Mlad.

This is me, reading each post of yours
#28
Posted 07 August 2012 - 04:18 AM
"Today is a lucky day for those who remain cheerful and optimistic."
Think about it.
#29
Posted 07 August 2012 - 11:56 AM

This is me, reading each post of yours
#30
Posted 09 August 2012 - 01:09 AM
Quote
This is a f**king
Not saying I didn't find the scene spectacular, but I think having some shots of policemen hurdling the bodies of their fallen friends would have added to the intensity.
#31
Posted 09 August 2012 - 01:49 AM
In Batman 2 there was nothing dumb about Batman torturing the Joker, getting beat down with a pipe, getting messed up by dogs, etc. I don't know why Nolan went full retard and forced us to endure e.g. lengthy shots of the Batjet hovering two inches over Battanks with nobody shooting at anybody, so that catwoman can magically ace a tank and prove Batman needs vaginal assistance.
The realism of human body battle damage in 2 was great, Batman getting all sore and bruised. In 3 he magically is fine after getting kidney stabbed - and not only doesn't bleed out but swims through miles of nuke-roiled ocean. Possibly there's a deleted scene where Catwoman uses her squidlike vagina propulsion system to rescue him from the superheated waves. Either that or he dramatically realizes that the only way to make it back is to take off his life vest.
I think Nolan just got lucky with 2. In 2 the romantic triangle is hyper-pozzed as Batman
Koanic's law of modern cinema: Most accidentally great movie becomes progressively gayer with sequels. This occurs at a rate higher than simple reversion to the mean, because greater attention is paid and effort expended on optimizing said sequels, thus more reliably expressing Hollywood's pozzy soul.
#32
Posted 09 August 2012 - 02:25 AM
Koanic, on 09 August 2012 - 01:49 AM, said:
In Batman 2 there was nothing dumb about Batman torturing the Joker, getting beat down with a pipe, getting messed up by dogs, etc. I don't know why Nolan went full retard and forced us to endure e.g. lengthy shots of the Batjet hovering two inches over Battanks with nobody shooting at anybody, so that catwoman can magically ace a tank and prove Batman needs vaginal assistance.
The realism of human body battle damage in 2 was great, Batman getting all sore and bruised. In 3 he magically is fine after getting kidney stabbed - and not only doesn't bleed out but swims through miles of nuke-roiled ocean. Possibly there's a deleted scene where Catwoman uses her squidlike vagina propulsion system to rescue him from the superheated waves. Either that or he dramatically realizes that the only way to make it back is to take off his life vest.
I think Nolan just got lucky with 2. In 2 the romantic triangle is hyper-pozzed as Batman
Koanic's law of modern cinema: Most accidentally great movie becomes progressively gayer with sequels as performance reverts to the mean.
#33
Posted 09 August 2012 - 02:33 AM
#34
Posted 09 August 2012 - 02:42 AM
#35
Posted 09 August 2012 - 03:04 AM
And since even Alfred didn't know he survived, we can assume he didn't get medical treatment anywhere that would recognize Bruce Wayne, i.e. all of Gotham.
There have been reasonable protagonist shivvings - e.g. Lex Luthor vs Superman. This was not one of them.
A stab in the back bad enough to instantly take a hardened fighter out of combat is going to be fatal without surgery to stop internal bleeding. Instead Nolan just forgot that Batman had been stabbed.
#36
Posted 09 August 2012 - 09:02 AM
Koanic, on 09 August 2012 - 02:33 AM, said:
CHRISTOPHER NOLAN FEMINAZIED DARK KNIGHT JUST TIE SOME CLOTHES TOGETHER YOU IDIOT HE WAS STABBED OFFSCREEN BUT ACCORDING TO MY 888 KNOWLEDGE OF MEDICAL ANATOMY FURTHERMORE
I was joking earlier about saying you had a point with the PUA angle, your rants are so wound up no one takes you seriously, although they are kind of funny in spite of themselves for how obsessively you return to dumb Internet rhetoric to explain your frustrations with the plot of an action movie
UGH ROLLEYES HERE COMES CATWOMAN TO LEND VAGINAL ASSISTANCE TO THAT STUPID POZ BATMAN IN HIS FIGHT WITH STUPID POZ BETA WHITE KNIGHT BANE DID I ALREADY SAY UGH WELL THE POINT STANDS
I think most people don't mind that in a movie nearly three hours long Nolan didn't tack on an extra 30 minutes showing Batman getting patched up, replaying exactly when and how he ditched, and answering other questions only you were asking out of annoyance at some girl being in the story...you don't even have a point about the policemen's charge but there's no good motivation for arguing with someone as out of it as you, just go on posting your run-on non sequiturs but don't imagine they're being read with chin-stroking thoughtfulness
you're dumb enough to believe some bedsheets and a rock will get you out of a giant pit, I'll take your ballistics and combat wound assessments with a grain of salt, assuming when I am watching it again I am torn away from the pacing, acting, story, and visuals by floating hallucinations of your posts bobbing to and fro
#37
Posted 09 August 2012 - 10:01 AM
What's brought me closure, though, is the suggestion that my criticisms will ruin your rewatch.
Thank you.
#38
Posted 09 August 2012 - 10:26 AM

This is me, reading each post of yours
#39
Posted 09 August 2012 - 11:17 AM
Koanic, on 09 August 2012 - 10:01 AM, said:
What's brought me closure, though, is the suggestion that my criticisms will ruin your rewatch.
Thank you.
#40
Posted 09 August 2012 - 12:43 PM
Koanic, on 06 August 2012 - 04:25 PM, said:
Koanic, on 09 August 2012 - 01:49 AM, said:
These posts are really cringeworthy - it's really disturbing to guess at how depraved and creepy you must be around real women.
To put it succinctly: you're ignorant about the criticism of film, which would be fine if you had taste, unique perspective or a decent way with words, but you're in privation here as well. If you had any introspection you would have come to the conclusion that your thoughts do not add value to this discussion, as they've all come from the perspective of social failure.
It's crystal clear that you're too dumb to be left alone to discover your own faults, so consider this charity: your type of boorish misogyny doesn't come across as worldly to anyone, and your lack of self-awareness and humor puts you right in rank and file with all of the other hopeless broken introverts and anosognosics on the internet. You should stop blogging and posting your diseased and worthless thoughts you deranged f****t











