Not sure if rape, also not sure if wife will love meif only girls couldn't divorce me or refuse sex
#21
Posted 30 July 2012 - 10:55 PM
make sure you love her, and more importantly that she loves you. if youre successful and you treat her well then you'll be golden.
right???
#22
Posted 30 July 2012 - 11:32 PM
Lets suppose you got married, had two kids, and got divorced at 35. I have news for you; your prospects romantically are much better than your wife's. The bad news is your old marriage will never really be dissolved. On the upside, you aren't a 35 year old female divorcee with 2 kids parsing STD riddled sex-fiend's lewd messages on OK-Cupid.
#23
Posted 31 July 2012 - 02:05 AM
the internet told me my future wife will charge me withtime rape and steal my children leaving me working two jobs as a walmart greeter until the Obama KKKorps comes to take me away to be nagger
seriously dude, get the f**k
#24
Posted 31 July 2012 - 06:13 AM
The Jewish Conspiracy, on 31 July 2012 - 02:05 AM, said:
the internet told me my future wife will charge me withtime rape and steal my children leaving me working two jobs as a walmart greeter until the Obama KKKorps comes to take me away to be nagger
seriously dude, get the f**k
Quote
#25
Posted 31 July 2012 - 06:22 AM
Rumpleshitskin, on 31 July 2012 - 06:13 AM, said:
The Jewish Conspiracy, on 31 July 2012 - 02:05 AM, said:
the internet told me my future wife will charge me withtime rape and steal my children leaving me working two jobs as a walmart greeter until the Obama KKKorps comes to take me away to be nagger
seriously dude, get the f**k
You're the one posting on here about being afraid to marry bro. My advice still stands. Stop worrying about what a bunch of fags on a niggerdeath forum have to say and go outside and live your life. I've been married for over a decade and have 2 kids. If I lived off the advice I got on the internet I'd be farming pine tar in montana married to a pure aryan descendant of the Wermacht becuase I wouldn't want a bunch of people I have never met to think of me as anything but a strugglehard motherfucking musclefrog with a hard on for curbstomping chimps.
HTH HAND
#26
Posted 31 July 2012 - 07:17 AM
Quote
#27
Posted 31 July 2012 - 07:34 AM
The Jewish Conspiracy, on 31 July 2012 - 06:22 AM, said:
#28
Posted 31 July 2012 - 12:57 PM
Rumpleshitskin, on 30 July 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:
Quote
Fair enough, but how are we supposed to do that in the current legal environment?
current?
Quote
http://fullofgracese...d-suffrage.html
Quote
“Between 1870 and 1920 the divorce rate rose fifteenfold, and by 1924 one marriage out of seven ended in divorce" -- James H. Jones, Alfred Kinsey: A Public/Private Life (New York: W. W. Norton, 1997), p.292.
http://no-maam.blogs...y-part-one.html
Nor is the alimony racket anything new.
Today feminists will tell you that as a man you should be thankful to them since you see, it was the patriarchy giving away children to women, something that they got changed to gender-neutrality which unfortunately still gives away children to women since you are a
Quote
as the history of previous century shows.
Quote
and your second wife will have more clout to change a law that impoversihes your paycheck than you. Look at the mass alimony reform video on youtube, and the time it took to change the Massachussetts alimony law.
So go ahead and do it already. And procreate, the white race neeeds more sackless f****ts
PS - no
#29
Posted 31 July 2012 - 01:06 PM
Quote
#30
Posted 03 August 2012 - 02:10 PM
Quote
On Aug. 31 Paul Donovan, age 50, a reliable long-haul trucker, lay down beside train tracks near his home in London, Ont., and rolled himself into the path of an oncoming train. Most people would call it a suicide.
Not his common-law partner, Brenda Higgins. Ms. Higgins holds Ontario’s Family Responsibility Office (FRO) liable for his death, and will launch a lawsuit to that effect.
Paul’s ex-wife works, owns a home and drives a new car. Neither she nor their children — today adults of 18 and 21 — are, or ever were, impoverished. Paul had been paying regular child support since 1996. But during the trucking industry’s recent hard times, Paul was temporarily unemployed, and missed two support payments.”
But f**k
Quote
#31
Posted 03 August 2012 - 05:05 PM
#32
Posted 05 August 2012 - 10:56 AM
PLEASUREMAN, on 03 August 2012 - 05:05 PM, said:
Seriously dude, this is why American culture is dying. The men don't give a s**t
That said, on topic:
Your best bet for love and happiness is to find a woman who loves you enough that she doesn't care if you get married to her or not. You might have better luck with this by moving abroad to cultures where gender roles are still intact.
If you want kids, don't get married to have kids. Just have kids with her and raise the family like you got married anyways. If she leaves you, you'll be on the hook for child support but probably not alimony (state laws on this vary), which in itself isn't that bad. Another way to circumvent co-habitation alimony laws is to have your legal residence at another location (like a cheap studio somewhere) and a nice house under her name.
Under the current harsh legal environment for men, you have to think outside of the box if you don't want to get skewered. The most expensive part of marriage is the marriage itself (15K is a cheap wedding nowadays?) and the divorce (all the legal fees, the proceedings, the division of assets, attorney fees).
Other than a blind adherence to the past, there isn't a reason to get married today. But it's still very possible to find love and happiness should you date through 1000 whores and find a whore who actually loves you.
#33
Posted 05 August 2012 - 03:22 PM
marriage is important for reasons that could never be explained to someone who thinks like a nagger
try reading Kruger and Dunning's "Unskilled and Unaware of It" and see if it makes an impact, their hypothesis can easily be extended to many fringe groups who believe in paranoid, bizarre, or primitive theories, theories that could only appeal to someone whose model of the world is surpassingly crude and simplistic...another problem is that because no one makes the exhaustive (and, actually, impossible) effort to correct them they conclude they are right about everything, when in reality it's simply not worth anyone's while to try to convince a fringe kook that the world is not hollow
birthers, holocaust deniers, truthers all fit into this category, as do MRA and "freemen" or whatever they're officially called
#34
Posted 05 August 2012 - 03:27 PM
#35
Posted 05 August 2012 - 05:33 PM
PLEASUREMAN, on 05 August 2012 - 03:22 PM, said:
marriage is important for reasons that could never be explained to someone who thinks like a nagger
try reading Kruger and Dunning's "Unskilled and Unaware of It" and see if it makes an impact, their hypothesis can easily be extended to many fringe groups who believe in paranoid, bizarre, or primitive theories, theories that could only appeal to someone whose model of the world is surpassingly crude and simplistic...another problem is that because no one makes the exhaustive (and, actually, impossible) effort to correct them they conclude they are right about everything, when in reality it's simply not worth anyone's while to try to convince a fringe kook that the world is not hollow
birthers, holocaust deniers, truthers all fit into this category, as do MRA and "freemen" or whatever they're officially called
There's no relation between declining marriage rates, falling birthrates, and the current marriage laws.
None at all.
#36
Posted 05 August 2012 - 05:35 PM
FACEROLL, on 05 August 2012 - 05:33 PM, said:
PLEASUREMAN, on 05 August 2012 - 03:22 PM, said:
marriage is important for reasons that could never be explained to someone who thinks like a nagger
try reading Kruger and Dunning's "Unskilled and Unaware of It" and see if it makes an impact, their hypothesis can easily be extended to many fringe groups who believe in paranoid, bizarre, or primitive theories, theories that could only appeal to someone whose model of the world is surpassingly crude and simplistic...another problem is that because no one makes the exhaustive (and, actually, impossible) effort to correct them they conclude they are right about everything, when in reality it's simply not worth anyone's while to try to convince a fringe kook that the world is not hollow
birthers, holocaust deniers, truthers all fit into this category, as do MRA and "freemen" or whatever they're officially called
There's no relation between declining marriage rates, falling birthrates, and the current marriage laws.
None at all.
if you hate, donate. if you think usa is gonna collapse, bringing about an end of the usd, then hedge your bet with some bitcoin. this could be our collective bugout fund, fellas...
#37
Posted 05 August 2012 - 05:38 PM
eloh, on 05 August 2012 - 05:35 PM, said:
FACEROLL, on 05 August 2012 - 05:33 PM, said:
PLEASUREMAN, on 05 August 2012 - 03:22 PM, said:
marriage is important for reasons that could never be explained to someone who thinks like a nagger
try reading Kruger and Dunning's "Unskilled and Unaware of It" and see if it makes an impact, their hypothesis can easily be extended to many fringe groups who believe in paranoid, bizarre, or primitive theories, theories that could only appeal to someone whose model of the world is surpassingly crude and simplistic...another problem is that because no one makes the exhaustive (and, actually, impossible) effort to correct them they conclude they are right about everything, when in reality it's simply not worth anyone's while to try to convince a fringe kook that the world is not hollow
birthers, holocaust deniers, truthers all fit into this category, as do MRA and "freemen" or whatever they're officially called
There's no relation between declining marriage rates, falling birthrates, and the current marriage laws.
None at all.
I hope you're not jealous.
#38
Posted 05 August 2012 - 06:14 PM











